thecablecde
EN
Sign in
Sign in with Whop
Pro
Account

Signed in, but this Whop account has no Pro membership.

Compare plans

Cable tests that are not equivalent, and why

IEC 60754-1 / -2 ≠ IS 10810-59

Not equivalent, because The Indian halogen-free limit sits at the method's own lower limit, so IS 10810-59 alone cannot show that a cable is halogen free.

IEC 60754-1 / -2

  • Halogen acid gas of the burnt material; the product standard sets the limit, for example BS 6724: HCl at most 0.5 % per component. Sources: BS 6724:1997+A3:2008, Table 2, p. 10 (read in the standard)
  • IEC 60754-2 recommends a weighted pH of at least 4.3 and a weighted conductivity of at most 10 µS/mm. Sources: IEC 60754-2:2011 (edition 2.0), Annex A p. 19 (recommended weighted pH and conductivity) (read in the standard)

IS 10810-59

  • Based on IEC 754-1:1982. The method is not recommended below 5 mg/g (0.5 %), and 0.5 % is the very limit the Indian product standards set for halogen free (HCl + HBr under 0.5 %). Sources: IS 10810 (Part 59):1988, cl. 2, p. 1 and the explanatory note, p. 4 (read in the standard); IS 17048:2018, cl. 5.3, p. 4 (flammability), cl. 5.6, p. 4 (smoke), Annex A item 9, p. 19 (halogen) (read in the standard)

Values as the sources print them, every one with its source and how it was seen; where a value is not held, it says so. The cable's own standard and the specification decide which test applies.

Questions and answers

Is IS 10810-59 equivalent to IEC 60754-1 / -2?

No. The Indian halogen-free limit sits at the method's own lower limit, so IS 10810-59 alone cannot show that a cable is halogen free.

Other comparisons

All the comparisons →