thecablecde
EN
Sign in
Sign in with Whop
Pro
Account

Signed in, but this Whop account has no Pro membership.

Compare plans

Cable tests that are not equivalent, and why

IEC 60332-3-24 (cat. C) ≠ IS 10810-61

Not equivalent, because IS 10810-61 is a tube test with its own fire and no IEC counterpart: an Indian FR or FRLS claim that rests on it says nothing about IEC 60332-3 or a CPR class.

IEC 60332-3-24 (cat. C)

  • 1.5 litres of non-metallic material per metre on a vertical ladder, 20 min of flame. Sources: IEC 60332-3-24:2000+A1:2008 (edition 1.1, 2009-02), Table A.1 p. 12; cl 5.1 p. 7; cl 5.3 pp. 8-9; Annex A p. 12; Annex B p. 13 (informative); cl 7 (read in the standard)
  • Pass: char height at most 2.5 m above the burner. Sources: IEC 60332-3-24:2000+A1:2008 (edition 1.1, 2009-02), Table A.1 p. 12; cl 5.1 p. 7; cl 5.3 pp. 8-9; Annex A p. 12; Annex B p. 13 (informative); cl 7 (read in the standard)

IS 10810-61

  • A cable or a small bundle (up to 35 mm) hung in a vertical steel tube of 125 mm diameter over an ethanol fire, for t = K + D/5 min; it must go out by itself. Sources: IS 10810 (Part 61):1988, Ed. 1.1 (2004), cl. 4, 6.1, 6.2, 8.1, 8.2 and the explanatory note, pp. 1-3 (read in the standard)
  • The method is the Swedish chimney test SS 424 14 75; it has no IEC counterpart, and no CPR class rests on it. Sources: IS 10810 (Part 61):1988, Ed. 1.1 (2004), cl. 4, 6.1, 6.2, 8.1, 8.2 and the explanatory note, pp. 1-3 (read in the standard)

Values as the sources print them, every one with its source and how it was seen; where a value is not held, it says so. The cable's own standard and the specification decide which test applies.

Questions and answers

Is IS 10810-61 equivalent to IEC 60332-3-24 (cat. C)?

No. IS 10810-61 is a tube test with its own fire and no IEC counterpart: an Indian FR or FRLS claim that rests on it says nothing about IEC 60332-3 or a CPR class.

Other comparisons

All the comparisons →