thecablecde
EN
Sign in
Sign in with Whop
Pro
Account

Signed in, but this Whop account has no Pro membership.

Compare plans

Cable tests that are not equivalent, and why

IEC 60332-3-24 (cat. C) ≠ FT4 / IEEE 1202 ≠ UL 1685

Not equivalent, because The burner, the flame time and the char limit differ.

IEC 60332-3-24 (cat. C)

  • 1.5 litres of non-metallic material per metre on a vertical ladder, 20 min of flame. Sources: IEC 60332-3-24:2000+A1:2008 (edition 1.1, 2009-02), Table A.1 p. 12; cl 5.1 p. 7; cl 5.3 pp. 8-9; Annex A p. 12; Annex B p. 13 (informative); cl 7 (read in the standard)
  • Pass: char height at most 2.5 m above the burner. Sources: IEC 60332-3-24:2000+A1:2008 (edition 1.1, 2009-02), Table A.1 p. 12; cl 5.1 p. 7; cl 5.3 pp. 8-9; Annex A p. 12; Annex B p. 13 (informative); cl 7 (read in the standard)

FT4 / IEEE 1202

UL 1685

Values as the sources print them, every one with its source and how it was seen; where a value is not held, it says so. The cable's own standard and the specification decide which test applies.

Questions and answers

Is FT4 / IEEE 1202, UL 1685 equivalent to IEC 60332-3-24 (cat. C)?

No. The burner, the flame time and the char limit differ.

Other comparisons

All the comparisons →